Could Dual Citizenship in the U.S. Be at Risk? What a Proposed Bill May Mean for U.S. Immigrants

Dual citizenship in the U.S. has long been seen as a powerful advantage — offering freedom of movement, expanded opportunities, and a sense of security across borders. For many immigrants, it represents stability and hard-earned success.

Recently, however, a proposed bill, the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 which seeks to establish “citizens of the United States... owe sole and exclusive allegiance to the United States” has drawn attention by raising the possibility of limiting or eliminating dual citizenship in certain circumstances. While the bill has not become law, its introduction has understandably caused concern among individuals who currently hold — or hope to obtain — more than one nationality.

What Is Being Proposed?

The bill aims to restrict the ability to hold passports from more than one country, potentially requiring individuals to choose a single nationality. Proposals like this are often framed around national security, allegiance, or administrative clarity.

It is important to emphasize:

• This is a proposal, not settled law.

• Bills often change significantly during the legislative process.

• Many proposed immigration measures never pass at all.

Still, the fact that such a bill is being discussed signals a broader trend toward greater scrutiny of immigration status and nationality.

Why This Matters to Immigrants

For immigrants, dual citizenship is not a “status symbol” — it is often a practical necessity:

• Protection from political instability or persecution.

• Ability to travel freely for family, work, or safety.

• Preservation of ties to one’s country of origin while building a future in the U.S.

Any attempt to limit dual nationality could create uncertainty, particularly for:

• Naturalized U.S. citizens who retained their original citizenship.

• Lawful permanent residents planning long-term.

• Asylum seekers and refugees considering future naturalization.

• Individuals from countries that do not allow renunciation easily or safely.

What the Law Currently Says

As of now:

• The United States allows dual citizenship.

• Naturalizing as a U.S. citizen does not automatically revoke citizenship from another country.

• Whether a person can keep dual citizenship often depends on the laws of their home country, not the U.S.

Nothing has changed — yet.

Why Proactive Legal Guidance Matters

Immigration law evolves through policy shifts, proposed legislation, and enforcement priorities. Even proposals that do not pass can influence how future laws are written or applied.

For clients, this is a reminder that:

• Immigration planning should be forward-looking.

• Decisions made today (asylum filings, naturalization timing, travel, declarations of allegiance) can have long-term consequences.

• Personalized legal advice is critical — especially for individuals with complex backgrounds or multiple national ties.

Our Approach: Strategy, Not Fear

At our firm, we believe in informing, not alarming. Proposed legislation should be viewed thoughtfully, not reactively. We closely monitor legal developments and help our clients understand:

• What is law vs. speculation.

• What risks are real vs. unlikely.

• How to protect their status while keeping future options open.

If you currently hold dual citizenship, are considering naturalization, or are navigating asylum or other immigration pathways, now is a good time to review your long-term strategy with an experienced immigration attorney.

Final Thoughts

Proposed bills come and go, but immigration decisions last a lifetime. Staying informed — and having the right legal guidance — ensures that changes in the political landscape do not catch you unprepared.

If you have questions about how potential changes to citizenship laws could affect you, we are here to help. Contact Geofrey M. Law — Your 50-State Immigration Law Firm — For Immigration Legal Advice You Can Trust.